HarnessYourBeauty.com
  • Food
  • Mental Health
  • Medical News
  • Sleep and Health
Medical News

Trump administration rolls back guidance specifying that ERs must offer abortion care when necessary

by admin June 5, 2025
June 5, 2025

See all topics

Email

Link Copied!

The US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said Tuesday that they were rescinding 2022 federal guidance to health care providers specifying that people should be able to access an abortion in the event of a medical emergency, even if state laws restrict such procedures.

The previous guidance from the Biden administration does not “reflect the policy of this Administration,” according to an announcement of the policy change.

CMS added that it will continue to enforce the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, known as EMTALA, and it specified that the policy included “identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.” However, it remains unclear exactly what the change will mean for emergency care, particularly in states with highly restrictive abortion laws.

Related article
People gather outside the Missouri Supreme Court building on March 12, 2025, in Jefferson City, Mo. (AP Photo/David A. Lieb)
People gather outside the Missouri Supreme Court building on March 12, 2025, in Jefferson City, Mo. (AP Photo/David A. Lieb)
David A. Lieb/AP/File

Abortions canceled again in Missouri after ruling from state Supreme Court

EMTALA requires all US hospitals that have received Medicare money — essentially nearly all of them — to screen everyone who comes into their emergency rooms to determine whether the person has an emergency medical condition without regard for their ability to pay for services.

The 1986 law also requires hospitals, to the best of their ability, to stabilize anyone who has an emergency medical condition or to transfer them to another facility that has that capacity. The hospitals must also treat these patients “until the emergency medical condition is resolved or stabilized.”

Pregnant people were singled out in 1989, after reports that some hospitals were refusing to care for uninsured women in labor. Congress expanded EMTALA to specify that it included people who were pregnant and having contractions.

In 2021, the Biden administration released the Reinforcement of EMTALA Obligation, which says it is a doctor’s duty to provide stabilizing treatment that “preempts any directly conflicting state law or mandated that might otherwise prohibit or prevent such treatment,” although it did not specify whether an abortion had to be provided.

Related article
People march through 8th Street in downtown Boise, Idaho, on May 3, 2022, in response to the news that the US Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide.
People march through 8th Street in downtown Boise, Idaho, on May 3, 2022, in response to the news that the US Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide.
Sarah A. Miller/Idaho Statesman/AP/File

Trump administration drops lawsuit seeking to ensure abortion access in emergency rooms

In July 2022, weeks after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that gave pregnant people a constitutional right to an abortion, the Biden administration’s guidance further clarified that EMTALA included the need to perform stabilization abortion care if it is medically necessary to treat an emergency medical condition. If a state law banned abortion and did not include an exception for the life or health of the pregnant person, that law was preempted by the federal statute.

After Roe was overturned, several states passed highly restrictive abortion bans. Thirteen have total abortion bans, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy organization focused on sexual and reproductive health that supports abortion rights. Twenty-eight states have abortion bans based on gestational duration: seven ban it at or before 18 weeks’ gestation, and 21 states ban abortion at some point after 18 weeks.

Idaho has one of the more restrictive laws, making it a felony to perform an abortion at any stage of pregnancy unless it was necessary to save the life of a pregnant person.

In 2024, the US Supreme Court formally dismissed an appeal over Idaho’s strict abortion ban. The decision was interpreted as meaning that pregnant people should be able to access an abortion in a medical emergency under EMTALA, but experts said that in reality, pregnant people were still being denied care. Some doctors even advised pregnant patients to buy life flight insurance in case they had an emergency complication that the doctors could not treat and the patient had to be flown out of state.

In March, the Trump administration took a major step in support of states with abortion bans when it dropped a Biden-era lawsuit against Idaho that sought to protect abortion access in medical emergencies.

Tuesday’s announcement from CMS says the agency will “work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration’s actions.”

Related article
20240726-supreme-court-idaho-abortion-ruling-gfx-final.jpg
Photo Illustration by Jason Lancaster/CNN/Getty Images

Exclusive: Inside the Supreme Court’s negotiations and compromise on Idaho’s abortion ban

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, a professional organization that represents the majority of practitioners in the United States, was critical of the move.

“Rescinding guidance clarifying protections for the care of pregnant people experiencing emergencies is a poor decision that will undoubtedly endanger the lives and health of pregnant women, who are already facing difficulties accessing needed abortion care during obstetrical complications,” Molly Meegan, the group’s chief legal officer and general counsel, said in an email Tuesday.

She said the announcement will “deepen confusion” about when emergency care is legal and exacerbate “overwhelming barriers to care” for people across the US.

“Abortion is an essential part of medical care, and EMTALA protections should be afforded to all patients in need of emergency care, including abortion,” Meegan said.

The ACLU, Democracy Forward and the National Women’s Law Center, organizations that have advocated for pregnant people’s right to an abortion, were also critical of the new decision, characterizing it as “caving to its anti-abortion allies” and saying it’s a reversal of Trump’s campaign pledge that he wouldn’t interfere with abortion access.

Related article
Mylissa Farmer stands for a portrait at her home in Joplin, Missouri, in September 2022.
Mylissa Farmer stands for a portrait at her home in Joplin, Missouri, in September 2022.
Nathan Papes/Springfield News-Leader/USA Today Network

Opinion: I was denied a life-saving abortion at two hospitals. Here’s what I think of the Supreme Court decision

“The Trump administration cannot simply erase four decades of law protecting patients’ lives with the stroke of a pen,” Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project, said in a statement.

No matter where a person lives in the United States, Kolbi-Molinas said, they should have access to emergency care, and the ACLU will “use every lever we have to keep President Trump and his administration from endangering our health and lives.”

Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women’s Law Center, called the administration hypocritical for its push for a new American “baby boom” while making a decision that the group says will put people’s lives at risk.

“To be clear: this action doesn’t change hospitals’ legal obligations, but it does add to the fear, confusion, and dangerous delays patients and providers have faced since the fall of Roe v. Wade,” Graves said in a statement.

This post appeared first on cnn.com
previous post
Texas girl thriving after fish skin helped heal her wound as a preemie: ‘I call her my little mermaid’
next post
A West Virginia prosecutor is warning women that a miscarriage could lead to criminal charges

You may also like

A West Virginia prosecutor is warning women that...

June 6, 2025

Despite Kennedy’s claims, vaccines have been tested in...

June 5, 2025

Texas girl thriving after fish skin helped heal...

June 4, 2025

New research presents promising findings on colorectal cancer...

June 2, 2025

Pfizer CEO: HHS claims of ‘concealed safety concerns’...

June 2, 2025

Covid-19 shots for kids remain on CDC vaccine...

May 31, 2025

How changes to Covid-19 vaccine policy in the...

May 31, 2025

Removing fluoride from public drinking water may lead...

May 31, 2025

HHS cancels $590 million contract with Moderna for...

May 29, 2025

RFK Jr. says Covid-19 shot will no longer...

May 27, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • How to cook tofu so even meat-and-potatoes diners will dig it

    June 2, 2025
  • Gwyneth Paltrow has started eating carbs and cheese again

    June 2, 2025
  • Eating more ultraprocessed food ups the risk of premature death, study finds

    June 2, 2025
  • Rising food prices in US getting in way of healthy eating, survey of Americans finds

    June 2, 2025
  • What eliminating artificial food dyes could mean for the food system

    June 2, 2025
  • Contacts
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 HarnessYourBeauty.com All Rights Reserved.


Back To Top
HarnessYourBeauty.com
  • Food
  • Mental Health
  • Medical News
  • Sleep and Health